Uneducating Americans on Vaping
Since the FDA began regulating vaping products as "tobacco" products, American ignorance about vaping's realtive risks has gotten worse.
Since the FDA began regulating vaping products as "tobacco" products, American ignorance about vaping's realtive risks has gotten worse.
The organization has a long history of pushing bogus anti-tobacco claims.
High taxes and heavy regulations are as effective as prohibition at creating black markets.
Kathy Hochul isn't just waging a war on menthols. She's also floating a ban on all cigarette sales in the state.
Even the best studies haven't surmounted a key statistical issue, and they tend to distort the evidence to make e-cigarettes look dangerous.
The appeals court says regulators violated the Administrative Procedure Act when they tried to pull menthol vapes off the market.
Another opinion exposing the Food and Drug Administration's vaping problem.
Thanks to tendentiously sloppy research, most Americans think vaping is just as dangerous as smoking. That’s not true.
And now the state thinks it needs to crack down even more.
To reduce cancer deaths, Biden should stop restricting safer nicotine alternatives.
Another potential legal setback for the FDA's attempt to regulate electronic cigarettes as tobacco products.
The obvious problems with the article reflect a broader pattern that suggests a peer review bias against e-cigarettes.
The agency is determined to ban the flavors that former smokers overwhelmingly prefer. For the children.
The country's strategy ignores the failures of prohibition.
The failure to consider the timing of diagnoses makes it impossible to draw causal inferences.
You can smoke all the pot you want, but flavored tobacco or nicotine is soon to be illegal.
By making e-cigarettes less appealing, it will discourage smokers from switching to a much less hazardous nicotine habit.
Bring on the black market.
It's about protecting adults from themselves, which should be none of the government’s business.
Voters have shown a propensity to veto the meddlesome efforts of lawmakers in the past.
The CDC is still citing underage consumption as a reason to restrict adult access.
Don’t expect a change in course, despite the long-awaited admission.
The state is prioritizing harm-reduction approaches for drug users. That's great. So why are lawmakers taking a maximalist approach to punishing smokers?
The "epidemic" of adolescent vaping seems to be fading fast, and vaping is replacing smoking among adults, a harm-reducing trend that regulators seem determined to discourage.
The likelihood that the Supreme Court considers the FDA's treatment of vaping products is increasing.
Formerly ubiquitous tobacco vending machine sales are now banned under a 2010 FDA measure.
Something is wrong at the Food & Drug Administration's Center for Tobacco Products, and federal courts are beginning to notice.
The agency’s policies would boost the black market and smoking-related deaths.
Banning less harmful tobacco alternatives is not a way to improve public health.
In a move that is likely to undermine public health, the agency warns that products containing synthetic nicotine "will be subject to FDA enforcement."
The proposed rule, which targets the cigarettes that black smokers overwhelmingly prefer, will harm the community it is supposed to help.
The agency's obsession with adolescent vaping is driving decisions that undermine public health.
Regulators have long targeted tobacco products, but there's new energy behind outright bans on vapes and cigarettes.
It’s likely to happen any day now.
The agency ignores downward trends in both kinds of nicotine use and obscures the huge difference in the hazards they pose.
A spending bill provision would redefine "tobacco products" to include products that have nothing to do with tobacco.
The findings reinforce the case for nicotine vaping products as a harm-reducing alternative to cigarettes.
The justices show little interest in vaping regulation on the shadow docket, but may yet review the FDA's behavior in the regular course.
The perverse provision would have discouraged smokers from switching to a far less hazardous source of nicotine.
Vaping regulation gets some attention on the Shadow Docket
An electronic cigarette manufacturer seeks a stay of FDA action from the Supreme Court.
Whatever else the BBB bill will do, this provision is bad for public health and could increase smoking's death toll.
In rejecting Breeze Smoke's application for a stay of the FDA's rejection of their product applications, the Sixth Circuit disagrees with the Fifth Circuit.
Cigarette sales rose last year for the first time in two decades, while a survey of high school seniors found they were vaping less but smoking more.
Yesterday's decision eviscerated the Food and Drug Administration for its arbitrary and capricious handling of vaping product applications
If teenagers like an e-liquid flavor, the agency seems to think, adults should not be allowed to buy it.